Protection of Human Rights in the Criminal Justice System: Contemporary Challenges and Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i3.1358Keywords:
Criminal Law; Judiciary; Challenges and Solutions.Abstract
Objective: This research aims to comprehensively analyze the multifaceted challenges surrounding the protection of human rights within the criminal law system. Specifically, it seeks to identify the key obstacles hindering the realization of human rights in the criminal legal process and propose contemporary solutions to address these challenges. The study focuses on the Indonesian context to provide practical insights into the efforts made by the government to enhance human rights protection within the criminal justice system.
Theoretical Framework: The study is grounded in the premise that the criminal law system encompasses legal regulations governing criminal acts, with variations shaped by local laws, culture, and legal principles. Key components include criminal law, law enforcement, criminal justice, punishment, rehabilitation, and adherence to human rights principles.
Methodology: The research relies on a comprehensive review of existing literature, legislation, and policy documents related to human rights in the Indonesian criminal justice system. It critically evaluates the challenges and proposes solutions based on a thorough analysis of the available data.
Results and Conclusion: The study reveals that Indonesia faces various challenges in ensuring human rights protection in the criminal justice system, including unequal law enforcement, violence, substandard prison conditions, corruption, discrimination, and violence against vulnerable groups. To address these challenges, the Indonesian government is actively working to reform the criminal law system, align it with international human rights standards, and prioritize justice and human rights protection within the criminal justice process.
Originality/Value:This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on human rights and criminal law by providing a detailed analysis of challenges and solutions in the Indonesian context. It highlights the importance of aligning domestic criminal law systems with international human rights standards for a more just and equitable society.
References
Aditya, Z. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2021). Indonesian constitutional rights: expressing and purposing opinions on the internet. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(9), 1395-1419.
Alexander, G., Rahayu, M. I. F., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility from Multinational Company in Indonesia Based on Perspective of Human Rights. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 17(8), e03713.
Ali, T. M., Yopiza, Y., & Rangkuti, P. R. (2023). Forgiving of the victim and/or family towards the perpetrator as a consideration in imposing criminal and punishment according to the law number 1 of 2023 concerning the criminal code. Jurnal rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(1), 1037-1051.
Apripari, A., Swarianata, V., Puluhulawa, J., Puluhulawa, I., & Matte, D. N. (2023). Investigating the Existence of Gorontalo Customary Law in the National Criminal Code. Dialogia Iuridica, 14(2), 119-143.
Arifin, K. K., & Primadianti, H. (2023). Reviewing the implications of the living law as an expansion of the legality principle in the criminal code. Sriwijaya Crimen and Legal Studies, 1(1), 44-55.
Bayley, D. H. (2002). Law enforcement and the rule of law: Is there a tradeoff?. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(1), 133-154.
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law?. Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190-214.
Djatmika, P., Safa’at, R., & Noerdajasakti, S. (2023). comparison of the judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) between civil law system and islamic law system (finding the formulation of the principle of rechterlijk pardon in indonesian criminal law). International Journal of Educational Review, Law and Social Sciences, 3(4), 1198-1210.
Ernawati, N. (2019). The Dilemma of Australian Pacific Solution: The Non-Refoulement Principle Versus National Security. Padjadjaran jurnal ilmu hukum (journal of law), 6(2), 340-360.
Ferdiles, L. (2019). Reformasi Hukum dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Pidana Nasional. Lex Publica, 6(1), 25-31.
Flora, H. S. (2022). Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia: A Prophetic Legal Study. Rechtsidee, 11, 10-21070.
Garcia-Blanco, I., & Bennett, L. (2021). Between a ‘media circus’ and ‘seeing justice being done’: Metajournalistic discourse and the transparency of justice in the debate on filming trials in British newspapers. Journalism, 22(1), 176-195.
Gless, S., Silverman, E., & Weigend, T. (2016). If robots cause harm, who is to blame? Self-driving cars and criminal liability. New Criminal Law Review, 19(3), 412-436.
Graham, L. F. (2014). Navigating community institutions: Black transgender women’s experiences in schools, the criminal justice system, and churches. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11, 274-287.
Hung, N. V., Thinh, T. C., & Ly, N. T. K. (2023). The Freedom to Sue in Vietnam’s Civil Procedure. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 17(7), e03652.
Husen, L., Anwar, A. I., Rahman, S., & Hidjaz, M. K. (2023). Implementation of Legal Guarantees for Human Rights Protection in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), e624.
Israhadi, E. I. (2015). Pembangunan Hukum Dan Sistem Hukum. Lex Publica, 2(1).
Jurasz, O., & Barker, K. (2021). Sexual Violence in the Digital Age: A Criminal Law Conundrum?. German Law Journal, 22(5), 784-799.
Kotzé, L. J. (2014). Human rights and the environment in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 1(3), 252-275.
Lines, R. (2006). From equivalence of standards to equivalence of objectives: The entitlement of prisoners to health care standards higher than those outside prisons. International journal of prisoner health, 2(4), 269-280.
McKay, C. (2020). Predicting risk in criminal procedure: actuarial tools, algorithms, AI and judicial decision-making. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 32(1), 22-39.
Moffett, L. (2015). Meaningful and effective? Considering victims’ interests through participation at the international criminal court. In Criminal Law Forum 26, (2), 255-289).
Mohammad, F., & Conway, P. (2005). Political culture, hegemony, and inequality before the law: law enforcement in Pakistan. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(4), 631-641.
Moise, A. E. (2020). The “Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege” Principle and Foreseeability of the Criminal Law in the Jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 3, 240-247.
Murphy, C. C. (2010). The principle of legality in criminal law under the ECHR. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 192.
Nurdin, B., & Turdiev, K. (2021). Paradigm of Justice in Law Enforcement in the Philosophical Dimensions of Legal Positivism and Legal Realism. Lex Publica, 8(2), 65-74.
Pascoe, D. (2023). Indonesia’s Revised Criminal Code and the Death Penalty–Progress Amid the Gloom?. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 24(1), 67-81.
Pasillas, R. M., Follette, V. M., & Perumean-Chaney, S. E. (2006). Occupational stress and psychological functioning in law enforcement officers. Journal of Police and Criminal psychology, 21, 41-53.
Safinatunnajah, A., Ali, M., & Teeraphan, P. (2022). Compliance of the Subjective Terms of Detention in Criminal Procedure with International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Lex Publica, 9(2), 88-101.
Samanta, C. N., & Hossain, M. B. (2022). Implementation of Diplomatic Assurance Against Torture: The Way to Reduce the Refugee Crisis in South Asia. Lex Publica, 9(1), 1-29.
Santoso, T. (2023). Principles of Indonesian Criminal Law. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sasmito, J. (2017). Application of the Retroactive Principle in Criminal Law on Gross Human Rights Violations. Lex Publica, 4(2), 775-781.
Supaat, D. I. (2022). Restorative Justice for Juvenile Drugs Use in Indonesian Court: A Criminological Approach. Lex Publica, 9(1), 94-110.
Suryono, H. (2020). The Effect of Globalization on the National Legal Policies of Human Rights. In The 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020) (61-66).
Syarifuddin, M. (2021). Legal Heuristic Approach in Judicial Practice. Lex Publica, 8(2), 1-13.
Sznycer, D., & Patrick, C. (2020). The origins of criminal law. Nature human behaviour, 4(5), 506-516.
Tompkins, K. (2005). Police, Law Enforcement and the Environment,” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 16, (3): 294–306
Tongat, T. (2022). The Ambiguous Authority of Living Law Application in New Indonesian Penal Code: Between Justice and the Rule of Law. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 188-209.
Wedha, Y. Y., & Nurcahyo, E. (2021). Criminal Law Reform Toward Deprivation of Property Resulting from Corruption Criminal Acts: A Criminological Perspective. Prizren Social Science Journal, 5(1), 97-103.
Yadav, A. K., Singh, A. K., & Indravesh. (2023). Global Legal Contexts for the Protection of Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), e1179.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Erna Dewi, and Maya Shafira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
